Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
Article Info
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose شماره 94

volume Number : 16
number In Volume : 12
issue Number : 94

Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 16، number In Volume 12، ، issue Number 94

A stylistic study of the epic poems of the Mughal era (Case study of Ghazan‌ Nameh and Shahnameh Changizi)

Seyyed Hassan Jamalizadeh , Khorshid Ghanbari Naniz (Author in Charge), Majid Hajizadeh

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The poems and epic works that were written after the Shahnameh and often following, establishing and imitating it in religious, heroic and historical contexts are among the sources that have received less attention from Ferdowsi scholars and Shahnameh scholars in the field of scientific studies. And while these works, in addition to the many influences in the field of linguistic, literary and intellectual style from Ferdowsi"s work, are also considered a very suitable source for criticizing and evaluating the success rate of composers in imitating Ferdowsi"s Shahnameh. The main purpose of the upcoming study is to examine and analyze Ghazannameh and Shahnameh Changizi as two Shahnameh poems written in the Mughal era, which were written in imitation of Ferdowsi"s Shahnameh.

METHODOLOGY: The method of study in this research is descriptive-analytical based on library studies. In this research, in order to present the literary style more precisely, the researchers systematically analyzed a thousand verses from each of the systems.

FINDINGS: The poems of Ghazannameh and Shahnameh Changizi were written in close imitation of Shahnameh. Both poets have tried to write an epic narrative in the form of a historical text by choosing weight, tone, themes and to some extent epic descriptions.

CONCLUSION: The results of the research indicate that in the two mentioned poems, linguistic features such as the use of sounds, phonemes, homophones, literary features such as simile and irony, and epic descriptions to a large extent show the composers" imitation of Ferdowsi"s Shahnameh, although due to the choice of historical subject (History of Ilkhans and Mughal Rulers) The use of Arabic, Turkish and Mongolian words, the use and use of similes in the form of detailed similes and little use of metaphors, it can only be said that the imitation of Ferdowsi is more prominent in the aspect of weight and music of words.

Keyword
Epic. Stylistics , Epic poems of the Mughal era , Ghazannameh , Shahnameh Changizi

Reference
  • Abbasi. Javad and Rashki Aliabad. Javad. (2010). “Regarding Ferdowsi's Shahnameh and Shahnamesoraei in the era of Mughal rule over Iran (case study: two handwritten Shahnamehs in Mughal history)”. Literary essays. No. 169. pp. 44-19.
  • Ferdowsi. Hakim Abulqasem. (2007). Shahnameh. Edited by: Saeed Hamidian based on the Moscow version. Tehran: Qatre.
  • Ghanbari Nenis. Vahid. (2018). Shahnameh of Genghis by Shamsuddin Kashani. Proofreading and research: Vahid Ghanbari Naniz. Tehran: Mahmoud Afshar Publications in collaboration with Sokhan Publications.
  • Ghanbari Nenis. Vahid. (2013). Correcting and comparing the historical masnavi of Chingizi Shahnameh Tarikh Manzum Mughal along with the introduction, appendices and lists, Ph. D. thesis on Persian language and literature. Bahnar University of Kerman, pp.three and nine.
  • Kgaleghie Motlagh. Jalal. (2002). old words. Tehran: Afkar, p. 329.
  • Modbari. Mahmoud and others. (2015). “Research on the condition of Shams Kashi and Shahnameh of Genghis. Ancient history of Persian literature”. Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 7 (1), pp. 109-89.
  • Modbari. Mahmoud. (2003). “The lexical benefits of Ghazannameh poem”. Academy letter. 6/2. pp. 61-38.
  • Monfared Farhani. Mahdi. (2004). “Ghazannameh is a Shahnameh from the Mongol era”. Book of the month of history and geography. Number 83.
  • Mortazavi. Manouchehr. (2006). Problems of the age of patriarchs. Tehran: Mahmoud Afshar Publications, pp. 555-558.
  • Noori Azhdari. Nuruddin Mohammad. (2002). Ghazannameh Proofreading, introduction and indexes: Mahmoud Modbari. Tehran: Afshar Endowment Foundation.
  • Razavi. Seyyed Abulfazl and Shahzadi. Ali. (2023). “Representation of the concept of the king of Islam in the era of Ilkhans: Research based on Ghazannameh Nouri Azdari”. Islamic history and civilization. 19 (42), pp. 117-93.
  • Safa. Zabihullah. (1994). History of literature in Iran. Tehran: Ferdous, p. 147.
  • Safa. Zabihullah. (1990). Epic writing in Iran. Fifth Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir, p. 358.
  • Safavi. Cyrus. (2001). Speeches in Linguistics. Tehran: Hermes, p. 5.
  • Shafiei Kadkani. Mohammad Reza. (2006). Poetry music. Ninth edition. Tehran: Agah, pp. 413-67.
  • Shafiei Kadkani. Mohammad Reza. (2013). Sovar khiyal in Persian poetry. 14th edition. Tehran: Agah, p. 9.
  • Shahbazi Asghar and Malek Sabet. Mahdi. (2012). “A sample of epic language review”. Scientific research quarterly of Persian language and literature research. Number 24. pp. 143-179.